原文摘要
I’ve built a lot of internal tools from scratch: React, REST APIs, styling, auth, the whole mess. It’s always 80% boilerplate and 20% actual logic.
Then I tried Refine AI.
You start with a real working app-like an HR dashboard, invoicer, or restaurant admin panel. It’s built with legit UI libraries (Ant Design, ShadCN), hooked up to real backends (REST, Supabase), and fully customizable in React.
Within an hour, I had a usable, styled, production-grade tool. Not a toy. Not a no-code black box. Just good scaffolding that lets you skip the grunt work and build what matters.
Honestly feels like what Vercel did for deployments, Refine is doing for internal apps
refine.dev/ai
Then I tried Refine AI.
You start with a real working app-like an HR dashboard, invoicer, or restaurant admin panel. It’s built with legit UI libraries (Ant Design, ShadCN), hooked up to real backends (REST, Supabase), and fully customizable in React.
Within an hour, I had a usable, styled, production-grade tool. Not a toy. Not a no-code black box. Just good scaffolding that lets you skip the grunt work and build what matters.
Honestly feels like what Vercel did for deployments, Refine is doing for internal apps
refine.dev/ai
💬3🔄7❤️50👀14813📊13
进一步信息揣测
- 内部工具开发的“80%样板代码陷阱”：实际开发中80%时间耗费在重复性基础搭建（如UI库集成、API连接、权限管理），仅有20%用于核心业务逻辑，这是行业普遍痛点但极少被公开讨论。
- Refine AI的“真实起点”策略：不同于传统脚手架从空白项目开始，它直接提供预置行业模板（如HR系统、餐厅后台），这些模板基于真实商业场景打磨，可能包含付费客户案例的优化细节。
- 技术栈内幕选择：明确绑定Ant Design/ShadCN等UI库和Supabase后端，暗示这些组合在内部工具领域已被验证为高兼容性方案，避免开发者踩坑小众技术栈的兼容性问题。
- “非低代码”定位的潜台词：强调“非无代码黑箱”，实则针对专业开发者群体，暗示市场上多数低代码工具存在二次开发锁死或性能瓶颈的行业黑幕。
- Vercel对标策略：将自身与Vercel类比，揭示内部工具开发领域缺乏类似“一键部署”的标准化解决方案，Refine试图成为该赛道的垄断者。
- 快速交付的隐藏成本：“1小时上线生产级工具”可能依赖云服务绑定或特定架构设计，长期来看可能存在供应商锁定（Vendor Lock-in）风险。
- 数据驱动的模板优化：底部数据面板显示超高浏览量（14,813）和互动率，暗示模板效果经过AB测试，但未公开具体转化漏斗和付费墙设计。
- 背后技术供应商关系：由xgo.ing提供技术支持，该平台可能深度参与企业级工具链生态，存在未公开的API调用或数据采集条款。